“This attribute you have, RETURN BY DEATH, is an incredible authority. In the truest of meanings
you cannot comprehend its utility. Not permitting the ends contrary to your desires, conducting
countless redos, reaching for the future countless times—for a researcher, this is near the ultimate
ideal. I mean, wouldn't it be? The result of any event will fundamentally, once a single result has
been reached, remain put. If you are still midway through the process of reaching a result, you can
make varied hypotheses as to what the result will be. If using this approach, or otherwise if using
these conditions, varied hypotheses and varied investigations are possible. But, if you are to
experiment with the purpose of producing a result, then the results, testable hypotheses, and
investigations will inevitably subsume into a single aggregate. Recreating completely, and I mean
completely identical conditions is impossible. No matter what conditions you arrange, you cannot
recreate the exact same conditions as you previously did. If you tried different methods back then,
what result would you now procure? That question is one us researchers will never attain the answer
for, nothing more than a dream existing in the forward path of what is ideal. For me and my
MEMORIES OF THE WORLD, I indeed have means to KNOW the answer, I certainly do. Do, but I don't
consider using that method, utilizing that method, as anything good. It's that I want TO KNOW, not
TO HAVE KNOWN. The thing creates this terrible contradiction, for me you could call it abominable.
But I'm getting off topic here so returning back to the point... right, we researches have to accept
results as being entirely singular, and for us who possess only one means of observation, your
existence, your authority, is something we desperately crave. You can run DIFFERING
INVESTIGATIONS under IDENTICAL CONDITIONS, you can see SEPARATE RESULTS differing from the
FUNDAMENTAL RESULT. That is the ultimate authority
